Preface |
|
xix | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxiii | |
|
|
xxv | |
|
Table of Federal Rules of Evidence |
|
|
xxxix | |
|
|
3 | (46) |
|
Rule 402: The Gateway to Admissibility |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
Problem 1-1: The Case of the Missing Cheesecake |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Defining Relevance: Rule 401 |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
Problem 1-2: Statutory Rape |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Problem 1-3: One Too Many for the Road |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (6) |
|
Problem 1-4: Tampering with Evidence |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Problem 1-5: Same-Sex Sexual Assault and Child Molestation |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
Problem 1-6: Green Baseball Cap |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Pragmatic Relevance: Rule 403 |
|
|
19 | (13) |
|
Problem 1-7: I Killed Sally |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Problem 1-8: Sexual Assault, Child Molestation, and Grand Theft Auto |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Problem 1-9: Pornographic Photographs |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Old Chief v. United States |
|
|
21 | (7) |
|
Campbell v. Keystone Aerial Surveys, Inc. |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
Rule 105: An Alternative to Exclusion |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Relevance of Probabilistic Evidence |
|
|
34 | (15) |
|
|
34 | (8) |
|
United States v. Chischilly |
|
|
42 | (3) |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
|
49 | (32) |
|
|
49 | (4) |
|
Ricketts v. City of Hartford |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Authentication of Physical Objects |
|
|
53 | (5) |
|
Problem 2-1: Coke and Guns |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
United States v. Cardenas |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Authentication of Written Documents |
|
|
58 | (8) |
|
Problem 2-2: The Threatening Note |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Authentication of Audio Recordings, Photographs, and Video Recordings |
|
|
66 | (6) |
|
Problem 2-3: A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words. . . |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
Problem 2-4: The Secret Recording |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (3) |
|
United States v. Tropeano |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Authentication of Telephone Conversations |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
First State Bank of Denton v. Maryland Casualty Co. |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Authentication of Electronic Communications: E-Mail and the Internet |
|
|
74 | (4) |
|
United States v. Siddiqui |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Shortcuts for Authenticating Evidence |
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
Relevance and Prejudice Refined |
|
|
81 | (60) |
|
|
81 | (34) |
|
Character of Accused and Victim |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Problem 3-1: Violent or Non-Violent? |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
Character As an Element of a Crime, Claim, or Defense |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Proving Character and Challenging Such Proof |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
United States v. Monteleone |
|
|
87 | (4) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Evidence of Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts Used for ``Other Purposes'' |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Huddleston v. United States |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Problem 3-2: What Are the Odds? |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Character Evidence in Sexual Assault and Child Molestation Cases |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Problem 3-3: He Said, She Said |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
Problem 3-4: He Said, She Said Redux |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
Problem 3-5: He Said, She Said Redux II |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Johnson v. Elk Lake School District |
|
|
109 | (5) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (6) |
|
Problem 3-6: Who Ran the Light? |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Problem 3-7: Seat Belt Snafu |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Subsequent Remedial Measures |
|
|
121 | (8) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Problem 3-9: Slip and Fall |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
Bush v. Michelin Tire Corporation |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Compromises, Payment of Medical Expenses, and Liability Insurance |
|
|
129 | (7) |
|
Problem 3-10: NASDAQ Attack |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
Problem 3-11: Distracting Cell Phone |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
Problem 3-12: Car Accident |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
|
133 | (3) |
|
Pleas and Plea Discussions |
|
|
136 | (5) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
Witness Qualification, Competency, and Examination |
|
|
141 | (122) |
|
|
141 | (17) |
|
Problem 4-1: Interstate Bicycle Accident |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S. v. McKay |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
Problem 4-2: How Sausage Is Made |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Problem 4-3: An Honest Misunderstanding |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (6) |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Direct and Cross-Examination of Witnesses |
|
|
161 | (12) |
|
United States v. Riccardi |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Twin Laboratories, Inc. |
|
|
168 | (4) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
Personal Knowledge Requirement |
|
|
173 | (4) |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
Calling and Interrogation of Witnesses by the Trial Judge |
|
|
177 | (3) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses |
|
|
180 | (7) |
|
Problem 4-4: Funny Lookin' and Funny Smellin' |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
Problem 4-5: ``He Sounded Like a Black Man'' |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor Engineering |
|
|
181 | (3) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
|
187 | (65) |
|
Qualification of Expert Witnesses |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
Problem 4-6: Pot-Smoking Expert Witness |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
Reliability of Expert Witness Testimony |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
|
190 | (6) |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
A Closer Look at Daubert and the Helpfulness Requirement |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
United States v. Chischilly |
|
|
199 | (4) |
|
|
203 | (3) |
|
Fingerprint and Handwriting Analysis |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (8) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
United States v. Prince-Oyibo |
|
|
214 | (4) |
|
United States v. Scheffer |
|
|
218 | (6) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
224 | (7) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (3) |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
Bases for Expert Witness Testimony |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
Opinion on the ``Ultimate Issue'' |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
Problem 4-7: Gay Panic Defense |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
FTC v. Enforma Natural Products, Inc. |
|
|
247 | (4) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
Exclusion and Sequestration of Witnesses |
|
|
252 | (11) |
|
|
252 | (9) |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
|
263 | (84) |
|
|
263 | (3) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
Attorney-Client Privilege |
|
|
266 | (31) |
|
Problem 5-1: Drinking & Driving |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
Problem 5-2: A Guilty Conscience |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
In re Grand Jury Subpoenas |
|
|
267 | (4) |
|
|
271 | (2) |
|
Upjohn Company v. United States |
|
|
273 | (5) |
|
|
278 | (2) |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
|
281 | (6) |
|
Swidler & Berlin v. United States |
|
|
287 | (4) |
|
|
291 | (2) |
|
Problem 5-4: The Misdirected E-Mail |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
|
297 | (14) |
|
Problem 5-5: Love & Loyalty |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
|
298 | (5) |
|
United States v. Singleton |
|
|
303 | (3) |
|
|
306 | (3) |
|
|
309 | (2) |
|
Psychotherapist Privilege |
|
|
311 | (12) |
|
|
311 | (10) |
|
|
321 | (2) |
|
|
323 | (12) |
|
Problem 5-6: The Bond between Mother and Child |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
|
323 | (11) |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
Clergy-Communicant Privilege |
|
|
335 | (12) |
|
Problem 5-7: Forgive Me, Father ... |
|
|
335 | (1) |
|
In re Grand Jury Investigation |
|
|
336 | (8) |
|
|
344 | (3) |
|
The ``Best Evidence'' Rule |
|
|
347 | (26) |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
What Qualifies As a ``Writing, Recording, or Photograph?'' |
|
|
348 | (5) |
|
Problem 6-1: The Libelous Billboard |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
Seiler v. Lucasfilm, Ltd. |
|
|
350 | (2) |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
What Qualifies As an Original? |
|
|
353 | (2) |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
|
354 | (1) |
|
What Constitutes Proving Contents of a Writing, Recording, or Photograph? |
|
|
355 | (5) |
|
Problem 6-3: The Libelous Billboard Revisited |
|
|
355 | (1) |
|
Problem 6-4: A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words Revisited |
|
|
355 | (1) |
|
|
356 | (1) |
|
United States v. Gonzales-Benitez |
|
|
356 | (1) |
|
|
357 | (2) |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
|
360 | (2) |
|
|
361 | (1) |
|
|
362 | (1) |
|
Production of Original Excused |
|
|
362 | (4) |
|
United States v. Marcantoni |
|
|
362 | (2) |
|
|
364 | (2) |
|
|
366 | (4) |
|
|
366 | (4) |
|
|
370 | (3) |
|
|
371 | (2) |
|
|
373 | (236) |
|
|
373 | (2) |
|
|
375 | (1) |
|
What Does It Mean to Be Offered to Prove the Truth of the Matter Asserted? |
|
|
375 | (10) |
|
Problem 7-1: Blowing Hot and Cold |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
Goodman v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Comm'n |
|
|
376 | (2) |
|
Problem 7-2: The Elm Street Garage |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
|
378 | (2) |
|
Problem 7-3: The Slanderous Statement |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-5: I'm the President |
|
|
382 | (1) |
|
|
382 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-6: The Bumper Sticker |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
|
384 | (1) |
|
|
385 | (1) |
|
What Is an ``Assertion''? |
|
|
385 | (12) |
|
Problem 7-7: Nobody Else Complained |
|
|
385 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-8: Say Something If It Hurts. . . |
|
|
385 | (1) |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-9: Did You Know? |
|
|
387 | (1) |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-10: Under a Watchful Eye |
|
|
389 | (1) |
|
Miller v. Dillard's, Inc. |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
|
391 | (4) |
|
|
395 | (1) |
|
|
396 | (1) |
|
Statements That Are ``Not Hearsay'' |
|
|
397 | (39) |
|
Prior Statements by Witness |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
United States v. Dietrich |
|
|
398 | (2) |
|
Problem 7-11: The Improper Motive |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
|
401 | (5) |
|
|
406 | (3) |
|
|
409 | (2) |
|
Admissions of a Party-Opponent |
|
|
411 | (1) |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
Pau v. Yosemite Park and Curry Co. |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
|
413 | (1) |
|
|
414 | (1) |
|
|
414 | (2) |
|
Southern Stone Co., Inc. v. Singer |
|
|
416 | (2) |
|
|
418 | (2) |
|
|
420 | (1) |
|
Admissions of Agents and Employees |
|
|
421 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-12: The Slip-and-Fall |
|
|
421 | (1) |
|
Mahlandt v. Wild Canid Survival & Research Center, Inc. |
|
|
421 | (4) |
|
|
425 | (1) |
|
|
426 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-13: The Drug Cartel |
|
|
426 | (1) |
|
Bourjaily v. United States |
|
|
427 | (4) |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
|
432 | (4) |
|
Unrestricted Hearsay Exceptions |
|
|
436 | (75) |
|
Present Sense Impressions and Excited Utterances |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-14: The Instant Message |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-15: The Cottage Cheese |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
United States v. Mejia-Velez |
|
|
437 | (2) |
|
|
439 | (2) |
|
Miller v. Crown Amusements, Inc. |
|
|
441 | (3) |
|
|
444 | (2) |
|
Statements for Purposes of Medical Diagnosis or Treatment |
|
|
446 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-16: The Hit & Run Accident |
|
|
446 | (1) |
|
United States v. Renville |
|
|
446 | (3) |
|
|
449 | (2) |
|
Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition |
|
|
451 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-17: The Reverberating Clang |
|
|
451 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-18: The Last Meeting |
|
|
451 | (1) |
|
Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Hillmon |
|
|
452 | (3) |
|
|
455 | (2) |
|
United States v. Houlihan |
|
|
457 | (3) |
|
|
460 | (3) |
|
Past Recollection Recorded |
|
|
463 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-19: The License Plate |
|
|
463 | (1) |
|
|
463 | (2) |
|
United States v. Hernandez |
|
|
465 | (3) |
|
|
468 | (2) |
|
Records of Regularly Conducted Business Activity |
|
|
470 | (1) |
|
|
471 | (3) |
|
Ebenhoech v. Koppers Industries, Inc. |
|
|
474 | (3) |
|
|
477 | (1) |
|
|
477 | (4) |
|
Public Records and Reports |
|
|
481 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-20: The Police Report |
|
|
481 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-21: Cocaine and Cartography |
|
|
482 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-22: The Unregistered Firearm |
|
|
483 | (1) |
|
|
483 | (5) |
|
Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey |
|
|
488 | (4) |
|
|
492 | (2) |
|
|
494 | (2) |
|
Reputation & Personal or Family History |
|
|
496 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-23: They Say It's Your Birthday ... |
|
|
496 | (1) |
|
Blackburn v. United Parcel Service |
|
|
497 | (6) |
|
|
503 | (1) |
|
Learned Treatises and Other Documents |
|
|
504 | (1) |
|
Costantino v. David M. Herzog |
|
|
504 | (5) |
|
|
509 | (2) |
|
Restricted Hearsay Exceptions |
|
|
511 | (52) |
|
|
512 | (1) |
|
United States v. Williams |
|
|
512 | (1) |
|
|
513 | (1) |
|
|
514 | (1) |
|
|
515 | (3) |
|
United States v. Peterson |
|
|
518 | (1) |
|
|
519 | (1) |
|
|
520 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-24: The Absent-Minded Witness |
|
|
521 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-25: The Maple Syrup |
|
|
521 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-26: The Car Accident |
|
|
522 | (1) |
|
|
522 | (1) |
|
United States v. DiNapoli |
|
|
522 | (5) |
|
Problem 7-28: The Antitrust Action |
|
|
527 | (1) |
|
Lloyd v. American Export Lines, Inc. |
|
|
528 | (4) |
|
|
532 | (1) |
|
|
533 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-29: The Last Breath |
|
|
533 | (1) |
|
|
533 | (2) |
|
United States v. Angleton |
|
|
535 | (7) |
|
|
542 | (1) |
|
Statements against Interest |
|
|
543 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-30: The Car Accident |
|
|
544 | (1) |
|
|
544 | (1) |
|
|
545 | (2) |
|
|
547 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-32: ``I Killed That S.O.B.'' |
|
|
548 | (1) |
|
Williamson v. United States |
|
|
549 | (6) |
|
|
555 | (1) |
|
|
556 | (1) |
|
Problem 7-33: The Grand Jury Witness |
|
|
556 | (1) |
|
|
557 | (4) |
|
|
561 | (2) |
|
|
563 | (7) |
|
Problem 7-34: The Grand Jury Witness II |
|
|
563 | (1) |
|
|
563 | (5) |
|
|
568 | (2) |
|
Hearsay and the Confrontation Clause |
|
|
570 | (39) |
|
|
570 | (3) |
|
|
573 | (1) |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
|
575 | (1) |
|
|
575 | (6) |
|
|
581 | (2) |
|
|
583 | (2) |
|
|
585 | (1) |
|
|
586 | (2) |
|
|
588 | (1) |
|
|
589 | (4) |
|
|
593 | (1) |
|
|
593 | (4) |
|
|
597 | (1) |
|
|
598 | (9) |
|
|
607 | (2) |
|
|
609 | (22) |
|
|
610 | (1) |
|
Problem 8-2: The Sweltering Heat |
|
|
610 | (1) |
|
Problem 8-3: Currency Exchange |
|
|
610 | (1) |
|
United States v. Marvin P. Jones |
|
|
611 | (2) |
|
|
613 | (4) |
|
|
617 | (2) |
|
|
619 | (3) |
|
United States v. William Allen Jones |
|
|
622 | (1) |
|
United States v. Amado-Nunez |
|
|
623 | (3) |
|
|
626 | (5) |
|
Burdens of Proof and Presumptions |
|
|
631 | (40) |
|
Burdens of Proof in Civil Cases |
|
|
631 | (2) |
|
Presumptions in Civil Cases |
|
|
633 | (17) |
|
Problem 9-1: Proving Discrimination |
|
|
637 | (1) |
|
|
638 | (3) |
|
|
641 | (3) |
|
St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks |
|
|
644 | (3) |
|
Alabama By-Products Corporation v. Killingsworth |
|
|
647 | (2) |
|
|
649 | (1) |
|
Burdens of Proof and Presumptions in Criminal Cases |
|
|
650 | (21) |
|
Problem 9-2: Proving Hate |
|
|
651 | (1) |
|
|
652 | (7) |
|
County Court of Ulster v. Allen |
|
|
659 | (4) |
|
|
663 | (4) |
|
|
667 | (4) |
|
Impeachment and Rehabilitation of Witnesses |
|
|
671 | (52) |
|
|
671 | (1) |
|
Character for Untruthfulness |
|
|
672 | (23) |
|
Untruthful Character and Conduct |
|
|
672 | (1) |
|
Problem 10-1: Lying for Beer, Lying for Jobs |
|
|
672 | (1) |
|
United States v. Whitmore |
|
|
673 | (5) |
|
|
678 | (3) |
|
|
681 | (1) |
|
|
682 | (2) |
|
Problem 10-2: The Criminal Resume |
|
|
684 | (1) |
|
Altobello v. Borden Confectionary Products, Inc. |
|
|
684 | (2) |
|
|
686 | (2) |
|
|
688 | (3) |
|
|
691 | (4) |
|
Impeachment for Bias or Motivation |
|
|
695 | (6) |
|
|
695 | (3) |
|
Firemen's Fund Ins. Co. v. Thien |
|
|
698 | (2) |
|
|
700 | (1) |
|
|
701 | (3) |
|
|
701 | (1) |
|
|
702 | (1) |
|
|
703 | (1) |
|
Impeachment by Contradiction |
|
|
704 | (2) |
|
United States v. Beauchamp |
|
|
704 | (1) |
|
|
705 | (1) |
|
Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statement |
|
|
706 | (6) |
|
Problem 10-3: The Turn-Coat Witness |
|
|
707 | (1) |
|
|
708 | (3) |
|
|
711 | (1) |
|
Rehabilitation of Witnesses |
|
|
712 | (5) |
|
|
713 | (3) |
|
|
716 | (1) |
|
Impeachment and Rehabilitation of Hearsay Declarants |
|
|
717 | (6) |
|
Problem 10-4: The Dead Witness |
|
|
717 | (1) |
|
|
718 | (3) |
|
|
721 | (2) |
|
Appellate Review of Evidentiary Rulings |
|
|
723 | (22) |
|
|
723 | (2) |
|
Problem 11-1: A Second Bite at the Apple |
|
|
724 | (1) |
|
Preserving Claims of Error for Appellate Review and the Timing of Appellate Review |
|
|
725 | (12) |
|
|
725 | (2) |
|
|
727 | (1) |
|
|
728 | (2) |
|
|
730 | (1) |
|
|
731 | (2) |
|
|
733 | (1) |
|
|
734 | (3) |
|
Standards of Review of Claimed Errors in Interpreting and Applying Rules of Evidence |
|
|
737 | (4) |
|
Peter Nicolas, De Novo Review in Deferential Robes?: A Deconstruction of the Standard of Review of Evidentiary Errors in the Federal System |
|
|
738 | (2) |
|
|
740 | (1) |
|
|
741 | (4) |
|
|
742 | (2) |
|
|
744 | (1) |
Index |
|
745 | |