Preface |
|
iii | |
|
|
1 | (46) |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Why Psychology Uses the Scientific Approach |
|
|
2 | (15) |
|
The Characteristics of Science |
|
|
2 | (6) |
|
The Characteristics of Psychology |
|
|
8 | (7) |
|
The Importance of Science to Psychology |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
Questions About Applying Techniques From Physical Sciences to Psychology |
|
|
17 | (16) |
|
Internal Validity Questions: Did the Treatment Cause a Change in Behavior? |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
Construct Validity Questions: Making the Leap From the Physical World to the Mental World? |
|
|
21 | (5) |
|
External Validity Questions: Can the Results Be Generalized? |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Ethical Questions: Should the Study Be Conducted? |
|
|
27 | (5) |
|
Conclusions About the Questions That Researchers Face |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Why You Should Understand Research Design |
|
|
33 | (5) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
To Protect Yourself From ``Quacks'' |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
To Be Scientifically Literate |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
To Increase Your Marketability |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (5) |
|
Generating and Refining Research Hypotheses |
|
|
47 | (24) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Generating Research Ideas From Common Sense |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
Generating Research Ideas From Previous Research |
|
|
50 | (4) |
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
Conclusions About Generating Research Ideas From Previous Research |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Converting an Idea Into a Research Hypothesis |
|
|
54 | (10) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Be Sure to Have a Rationale: How Theory Can Help |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Demonstrate Its Relevance: Theory Versus Trivia |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Refine It: 10 Time-Tested Tips |
|
|
58 | (5) |
|
Make Sure That Testing the Hypothesis Is Both Practical and Ethical |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Changing Unethical and Impractical Ideas Into Research Hypotheses |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
Make Variables More General |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Use Smaller Scale Models of the Situation |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
Carefully Screen Potential Participants |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
Use ``Moderate'' Manipulations |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
Do Not Manipulate Variables |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
Measuring and Manipulating Variables: Reliability And Validity |
|
|
71 | (49) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Choosing a Behavior to Measure |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Errors in Measuring Behavior |
|
|
73 | (13) |
|
Overview of Types of Errors |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
Two Types of Observer Errors |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
Errors in Administering the Measure |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Errors Due to the Participant |
|
|
81 | (4) |
|
Summary of Types of Measurement Error |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Reliability: The (Relative) Absence of Random Error |
|
|
86 | (11) |
|
The Importance of Being Reliable: Reliability as a Prerequisite to Validity |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Using Test-Retest Reliability to Assess Overall Reliability: To What Degree Is a Measure ``Random Error Free''? |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
Identifying (and Then Dealing With) the Main Source of a Measure's Reliability Problems |
|
|
88 | (8) |
|
Conclusions About Reliability |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Beyond Reliability: Establishing Construct Validity |
|
|
97 | (10) |
|
Content Validity: Does Your Test Have the Right Stuff? |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Internal Consistency Revisited: Evidence That You Are Measuring One Characteristic |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
Convergent Validation Strategies: Statistical Evidence That You Are Measuring the Right Construct |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
Discriminant Validation Strategies: Showing That You Are Not Measuring the Wrong Construct |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
Summary of Construct Validity |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (7) |
|
Common Threats to a Manipulation's Validity |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Evidence Used to Argue for a Manipulation's Construct Validity |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Tradeoffs Among Three Common Types of Manipulations |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
Manipulating Variables: Conclusions |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
Beyond Reliability and Validity: Choosing the Best Measure for Your Study |
|
|
120 | (23) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Sensitivity: Will the Measure Be Able to Detect the Differences You Need to Detect? |
|
|
122 | (6) |
|
Achieving The Necessary Level of Sensitivity |
|
|
122 | (5) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Scales of Measurement: Will the Measure Allow You to Make the Kinds of Comparisons You Need to Make? |
|
|
128 | (10) |
|
The Different Scales of Measurement |
|
|
128 | (4) |
|
Why Our Numbers Do Not Always Measure Up |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Which Level of Measurement Do You Need? |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
Conclusions About Scales of Measurement |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Ethical and Practical Considerations |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
|
143 | (32) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (12) |
|
Why We Never Have Identical Groups |
|
|
145 | (11) |
|
Conclusions About Two-Group Designs |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Problems With the Pretest-Posttest Design |
|
|
157 | (7) |
|
Three Reasons Participants May Change Between Pretest and Posttest |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
How Measurement Changes May Cause Scores to Change Between Pretest and Pretest |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
Conclusions About Trying to Keep Everything Except the Treatment Constant |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Ruling out Extraneous Variables |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
Accounting for Extraneous Variables |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
Identifying Extraneous Variables |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
The Relationship Between Internal and External Validity |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
|
175 | (48) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Basic Logic and Terminology |
|
|
177 | (13) |
|
Experimental Hypothesis: The Treatment Has an Effect |
|
|
177 | (3) |
|
Null Hypothesis: The Treatment Does Not Have an Effect |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
Conclusions About Experimental and Null Hypotheses |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Manipulating the Independent Variable |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Experimental and Control Groups: Similar, but Treated Differently |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
The Value of Independence: Why Control and Experimental Groups Shouldn't Really Be ``Groups'' |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
The Value of Assignment (Manipulating the Treatment) |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
Collecting the Dependent Variable |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
The Statistical Significance Decision: Deciding Whether to Declare That a Difference Is Not a Coincidence |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Statistically Significant Results: Declaring That the Treatment Has a Reliable Effect |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
Null Results: Why We Can't Draw Conclusions From Nonsignificant Results |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
Summary of the ``Ideal'' Simple Experiment |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
Errors in Determining Whether Results Are Statistically Significant |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
Type 1 Errors: ``Crying Wolf'' |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
Type 2 Errors: ``Failing to Announce the Wolf'' |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
The Need to Prevent Type 2 Errors: Why You Want the Power to Find Significant Differences |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
Statistics and the Design of the Simple Experiment |
|
|
193 | (5) |
|
Power and the Design of the Simple Experiment |
|
|
194 | (3) |
|
Conclusions About How Statistical Considerations Impact Design Decisions |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Nonstatistical Considerations and the Design of the Simple Experiment |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
External Validity Versus Power |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Construct Validity Versus Power |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Analyzing Data From the Simple Experiment: Basic Logic |
|
|
201 | (10) |
|
Estimating What You Want to Know: Your Means Are Sample Means |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
Why We Must Do More Than Subtract the Means From Each Other |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
How Random Error Affects Data From the Simple Experiment |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
When Is a Difference Too Big to Be Due to Random Error? |
|
|
207 | (4) |
|
Analyzing the Results of the Simple Experiment: The t-Test |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Assumptions of the t-Test |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Questions Raised by Results |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
Questions Raised by Nonsignificant Results |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
Questions Raised by Significant Results |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
|
217 | (3) |
|
|
220 | (3) |
|
Expanding the Simple Experiment: The Multiple-Group Experiment |
|
|
223 | (36) |
|
|
124 | (100) |
|
The Advantages of Using More Than Two Values of an Independent Variable |
|
|
224 | (15) |
|
Comparing More Than Two Kinds of Treatments |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
Comparing Two Kinds of Treatments With No Treatment |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Comparing More Than Two Levels (Amounts) of an Independent Variable to Increase External Validity |
|
|
226 | (7) |
|
Using Multiple Levels to Improve Construct Validity |
|
|
233 | (6) |
|
Analysis of Multiple-Group Experiments |
|
|
239 | (13) |
|
Analyzing the Multiple-Group Experiment: An Intuitive Overview |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
A Closer Look ac the Analysis of a Multiple-Group Experiment |
|
|
242 | (10) |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
Expanding the Simple Experiment: Factorial Designs |
|
|
259 | (56) |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
The 2 x 2 Factorial Design |
|
|
260 | (12) |
|
How One Experiment Can Do as Much as Two |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
How One Experiment Can Do More Than Two |
|
|
262 | (8) |
|
Example of Questions Answered by the 2 x 2 Factorial Experiment |
|
|
270 | (2) |
|
Potential Results of a 2 x 2 Factorial Experiment |
|
|
272 | (14) |
|
A Main Effect and No Interaction |
|
|
273 | (5) |
|
Two Main Effects and No Interaction |
|
|
278 | (2) |
|
Two Main Effects and an Interaction |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
Interaction Without Main Effects |
|
|
281 | (2) |
|
One Main Effect and an Interaction |
|
|
283 | (2) |
|
No Main Affects and No Interaction |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
Analyzing the Results From a 2 x 2 Experiment |
|
|
286 | (14) |
|
What Degrees of Freedom Tell You |
|
|
286 | (2) |
|
Interpreting the Results of an ANOVA Table |
|
|
288 | (12) |
|
Putting the 2 x 2 to Work |
|
|
300 | (5) |
|
Adding a Replication Factor to Increase Generalizability |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
Using an Interaction to Find an Exception to the Rule: Looking at a Potential Moderating Factor |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
Using Interactions to Create New Rules |
|
|
303 | (2) |
|
The Hybrid Design: A Factorial Design That Allows You to Study Nonexperimental Variables |
|
|
305 | (4) |
|
Increasing Generalizability |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
Studying Effects of Similarity |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
Finding an Exception to the Rule |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
|
309 | (2) |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
|
312 | (3) |
|
|
315 | (40) |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
|
317 | (6) |
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
Considerations in Using Matched-Pairs Designs |
|
|
317 | (5) |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
Summary of the Matched-Pairs Design |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
Within-Subjects (Repeated Measures) Designs |
|
|
323 | (8) |
|
Considerations in Using Within-Subjects Designs |
|
|
323 | (5) |
|
Dealing With Order Effects |
|
|
328 | (3) |
|
Randomized Within-Subjects Designs |
|
|
331 | (2) |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
Summary of Randomized Within-Subjects Designs |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
Counterbalanced Within-Subjects Designs |
|
|
333 | (12) |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
Advantages and Disadvantages of Counterbalancing |
|
|
334 | (10) |
|
Conclusions About Counterbalanced Within-Subjects Designs |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
|
345 | (5) |
|
Choosing Designs: The Two-Conditions Case |
|
|
345 | (1) |
|
Choosing Designs: When You Have More Than One Independent Variable |
|
|
346 | (4) |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
|
351 | (2) |
|
|
353 | (2) |
|
Reading and Evaluating Research |
|
|
355 | (28) |
|
|
356 | (1) |
|
Reading for Understanding |
|
|
356 | (12) |
|
|
356 | (1) |
|
|
357 | (1) |
|
|
357 | (4) |
|
Reading the Method Section |
|
|
361 | (2) |
|
Reading the Results Section |
|
|
363 | (4) |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
Developing Research Ideas From Existing Research |
|
|
368 | (12) |
|
|
368 | (5) |
|
The Systematic Replication |
|
|
373 | (4) |
|
The Conceptual Replication |
|
|
377 | (1) |
|
The Value of Replications |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
|
382 | (1) |
|
Single-N Designs And Quasi-Experiments |
|
|
383 | (43) |
|
|
384 | (1) |
|
Inferring Causality in Randomized Experiments |
|
|
384 | (2) |
|
|
384 | (1) |
|
Establishing Temporal Precedence |
|
|
385 | (1) |
|
|
385 | (1) |
|
|
386 | (14) |
|
Keeping Nontreatment Factors Constant: The A-B Design |
|
|
387 | (4) |
|
Variations on the A-B Design |
|
|
391 | (5) |
|
Evaluation of Single-n Designs |
|
|
396 | (3) |
|
Conclusions About Single-n Designs |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
|
400 | (20) |
|
The Problem: Accounting for Nontreatment Factors |
|
|
401 | (5) |
|
|
406 | (8) |
|
The Nonequivalent Control-Group Design |
|
|
414 | (5) |
|
Conclusions About Quasi-Experimental Designs |
|
|
419 | (1) |
|
|
420 | (1) |
|
|
420 | (2) |
|
|
422 | (3) |
|
|
425 | (1) |
|
Introduction to Descriptive Methods |
|
|
426 | (42) |
|
|
427 | (1) |
|
Uses and Limitations of Descriptive Methods |
|
|
427 | (5) |
|
Descriptive Research and Causality |
|
|
428 | (2) |
|
Description for Description's Sake |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
Description for Prediction's Sake |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
Why We Need Science to Describe Behavior |
|
|
432 | (3) |
|
We Need Scientific Measurement |
|
|
432 | (1) |
|
We Need Systematic, Scientific Record-Keeping |
|
|
433 | (1) |
|
We Need Objective Ways to Determine If Variables Are Related |
|
|
433 | (1) |
|
We Need Scientific Methods to Generalize From Experience |
|
|
434 | (1) |
|
Conclusions About the Need for Descriptive Research |
|
|
435 | (1) |
|
|
435 | (8) |
|
Data You Previously Collected |
|
|
435 | (2) |
|
|
437 | (3) |
|
|
440 | (2) |
|
|
442 | (1) |
|
Describing Data From Correlational Studies |
|
|
443 | (10) |
|
|
444 | (3) |
|
|
447 | (6) |
|
Summary of Describing Correlational Data |
|
|
453 | (1) |
|
Making Inferences From Correlational Data |
|
|
453 | (10) |
|
Analyses Based on Correlation Coefficients |
|
|
454 | (2) |
|
Analyses Not Involving Correlation Coefficients |
|
|
456 | (4) |
|
Interpreting Significant Results |
|
|
460 | (2) |
|
Interpreting Null Results |
|
|
462 | (1) |
|
|
463 | (1) |
|
|
463 | (2) |
|
|
465 | (1) |
|
|
466 | (2) |
|
|
468 | (43) |
|
|
469 | (1) |
|
Questions to Ask Before Doing Survey Research |
|
|
470 | (7) |
|
|
470 | (4) |
|
Can Self Report Provide Accurate Answers? |
|
|
474 | (2) |
|
To Whom Will Your Results Apply? |
|
|
476 | (1) |
|
Conclusions About the Advantages and Disadvantages of Survey Research |
|
|
477 | (1) |
|
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Survey Instruments |
|
|
477 | (6) |
|
|
477 | (3) |
|
|
480 | (3) |
|
|
483 | (16) |
|
Deciding on a Research Question |
|
|
483 | (1) |
|
Choosing the Format of Your Questions |
|
|
484 | (4) |
|
Choosing the Format of Your Survey |
|
|
488 | (1) |
|
Editing Questions: Nine Mistakes to Avoid |
|
|
489 | (3) |
|
|
492 | (2) |
|
Putting the Final Touches on Your Survey Instrument |
|
|
494 | (1) |
|
Choosing a Sampling Strategy |
|
|
495 | (4) |
|
|
499 | (1) |
|
|
500 | (6) |
|
|
500 | (3) |
|
Using Inferential Statistics |
|
|
503 | (3) |
|
|
506 | (1) |
|
|
506 | (1) |
|
|
507 | (3) |
|
|
510 | (1) |
|
Putting It All Together: Writing Research Proposals and Reports |
|
|
511 | |
|
|
512 | (1) |
|
Aids to Developing Your Idea |
|
|
512 | (2) |
|
|
512 | (1) |
|
|
513 | (1) |
|
Writing the Research Proposal |
|
|
514 | (21) |
|
General Strategies for Writing the Introduction |
|
|
514 | (4) |
|
Specific Strategies for Writing Introduction Sections for Different Types of Studies |
|
|
518 | (6) |
|
Writing the Method Section |
|
|
524 | (3) |
|
Writing the Results Section |
|
|
527 | (1) |
|
Writing the Discussion Section |
|
|
528 | (2) |
|
Putting on the Front and Back |
|
|
530 | (5) |
|
Writing the Research Report |
|
|
535 | (5) |
|
What Stays the Same of Changes Very Little |
|
|
535 | (1) |
|
Writing the Results Section |
|
|
535 | (4) |
|
Writing the Discussion Section |
|
|
539 | (1) |
|
|
540 | (1) |
|
|
540 | (1) |
|
|
541 | |
Appendix A Ethics |
|
A-2 | |
Appendix B Searching the Literature (Electronically and the Old-Fashioned Way) |
|
B-1 | |
Appendix C Conducting a Study |
|
C-1 | |
Appendix D Sample Research Paper |
|
D-1 | |
Appendix E Statistics and Random Numbers Tables |
|
E-1 | |
Appendix F Introduction to Statistics |
|
F-1 | |
Glossary |
|
G-1 | |
References |
|
R-1 | |
Credits |
|
CR-1 | |
Index |
|
I-1 | |