List of Figures and Tables |
|
xv | |
Preface |
|
xvii | |
I. Introduction |
|
1 | (50) |
|
1. Refocusing the Discussion of Methodology |
|
|
3 | (18) |
|
Henry E. Brady, David Collier, and Jason Seawright |
|
|
|
Mainstream Quantitative Methods, Qualitative Methods, and Statistical Theory |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
The Debate on Designing Social Inquiry |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Where Do We Go from Here? |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
Toward an Alternative View of Methodology |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
|
14 | (8) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Critiques of the Quantitative Template |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Linking the Quantitative and Qualitative Traditions |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Diverse Tools, Shared Standards |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
2. The Quest for Standards: King, Keohane, and Verba's Designing Social Inquiry |
|
|
21 | (30) |
|
David Collier, Jason Seawright, and Gerardo L. Munck |
|
|
|
Scientific Research, Inference, and Assumptions |
|
|
22 | (14) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Making Inferences: Quantitative Tools and Analytic Goals |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Independence of Observations |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (5) |
|
Guidelines: Summarizing DST's Framework |
|
|
36 | (8) |
|
A. Defining the Research Problem |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
C. Selecting Cases and Observations |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
F. Further Testing and Reformulating the Theory |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Anticipating the Discussion of DSI's Framework |
|
|
44 | (9) |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
|
46 | (5) |
II. Critiques of the Quantitative Template |
|
51 | (52) |
|
3. Doing Good and Doing Better: How Far Does the Quantitative Template Get Us? |
|
|
53 | (16) |
|
|
|
Theology versus Homiletics |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
Descending from the Rhetorical Heights |
|
|
56 | (10) |
|
Explanation and Causality |
|
|
56 | (6) |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
4. Some Unfulfilled Promises of Quantitative Imperialism |
|
|
69 | (6) |
|
|
|
The Contribution and a Shortcoming |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Omissions and an Agenda for Research |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
5. How Inference in the Social (but Not the Physical) Sciences Neglects Theoretical Anomaly |
|
|
75 | (10) |
|
|
|
Problemation and Deductive Theorizing |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Theory and Anomaly: Some Examples |
|
|
77 | (5) |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
6. Claiming Too Much: Warnings about Selection Bias |
|
|
85 | (18) |
|
David Collier, James Mahoney, and Jason Seawright |
|
|
|
Do the Warnings Claim Too Much? |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
Selecting Extreme Values on the Dependent Variable: Why Is It an Issue? |
|
|
88 | (4) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Understanding Why Selection Bias Results from Truncation |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
Selection Bias in Qualitative Research |
|
|
92 | (7) |
|
Cross-Case Analysis and Selection Bias |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Within-Case Analysis and Selection Bias |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Evaluating the Causal Relationship |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Atypical Cases and Overgeneralization |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
Stern Warnings about No-Variance Designs |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Further Observations about Cross-Case and Within-Case Comparison |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (2) |
III. Qualitative Tools |
|
103 | (66) |
|
7. Tools for Qualitative Research |
|
|
105 | (18) |
|
|
|
Qualitative Methods: A Survey of Tools |
|
|
107 | (13) |
|
Defining the Universe of Cases: Context, Typologies, and Process Tracing |
|
|
107 | (5) |
|
Case Selection: Dilemmas of Increasing the Number of Observations |
|
|
112 | (3) |
|
Measurement and Data Collection |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Causal Assessment in Cross-Case and Within-Case Designs |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
Beyond Strict Hypothesis Testing: Theory Generation, Reformulation, and the Iterated Assessment of Hypotheses |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
8. Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challenges Variable-Oriented Research |
|
|
123 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
Study of Uniform Outcomes |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
Definition of Negative Cases |
|
|
130 | (3) |
|
Examination of Multiple and Conjunctural Causes |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
Treatment of Nonconforming Cases and "Determinism" |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
9. Case Studies and the Limits of the Quantitative Worldview |
|
|
139 | (30) |
|
|
|
Philosophy of Science and the Logic of Research |
|
|
140 | (4) |
|
DSI's Philosophy of Science |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
DSI and the Popperian View of Theory |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
A Single Logic of Research |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Is Inference Fundamentally Quantitative? |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
Making Inferences from One or a Few Cases |
|
|
146 | (8) |
|
Toward a Methodology of Intensive Research: An Alternative Logic for Case Studies |
|
|
154 | (12) |
|
Understanding Existing Research |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Game Theory Applied to Empirical Situations |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
A "Folk Bayesian" Approach |
|
|
158 | (4) |
|
Heuristics for Theory Construction |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Case Selection Heuristics |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Thought Experiments and Counterfactuals |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Exploiting Feedback from Observation to Design |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Identifying Causal Processes Rather than Testing |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
|
166 | (3) |
IV. Linking the Quantitative and Qualitative Traditions |
|
169 | (1) |
|
10. Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide |
|
|
171 | (22) |
|
|
|
Challenges of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Data |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
Tools for Bridging the Divide |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Tracing Processes to Interpret Decisions |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Systematic and Nonsystematic Variable Discrimination |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
Framing Qualitative Research within Quantitative Profiles |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
Putting Qualitative Flesh on Quantitative Bones |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Sequencing Quantitative and Qualitative Research |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
11. The Importance of Research Design |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba |
|
|
|
|
182 | (4) |
|
Our Alleged Errors of Omission |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
Science as a Collective Enterprise |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Lijphart: The Case Study That Broke the Pluralist Camel's Back |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Allen: Distinguishing History from Social Science |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
The Perils of Avoiding Selection Bias |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
Katzenstein: Distinguishing Descriptive Inference from Causal Inference |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Bates: How to Identify a Dependent Variable |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
|
191 | (2) |
V. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards |
|
193 | (1) |
|
12. Critiques, Responses, and Trade-Offs: Drawing Together the Debate |
|
|
195 | (72) |
|
David Collier, Henry E. Brady, and Jason Seawright |
|
|
|
Critiques and Statistical Responses |
|
|
196 | (25) |
|
Doing Research That Is Important |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
The Challenge of Promoting Creativity |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
Innovative Research, Trade-Offs, and DSI's Framework |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Conceptualization and Measurement |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (5) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
Probabilistic versus Deterministic Models of Causation |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (4) |
|
The Statistical Responses |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
Trade-Offs in Research Design |
|
|
221 | (5) |
|
Trade-Offs, Goals, and Tools |
|
|
221 | (3) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
Placing Trade-Offs at the Center of Attention |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
13. Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
David Collier, Henry E. Brady, and Jason Seawright |
|
|
|
Revisiting Some Key Distinctions |
|
|
230 | (14) |
|
Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, Observational Studies, and Inferential Monsters |
|
|
230 | (3) |
|
Mainstream Quantitative Methods versus Statistical Theory |
|
|
233 | (3) |
|
Determinate versus Indeterminate Research Designs |
|
|
236 | (2) |
|
Data Mining versus Specification Searches |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
Conditional Independence or the Specification Assumption |
|
|
240 | (4) |
|
Four Approaches to the Qualitative versus Quantitative Distinction |
|
|
244 | (6) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (3) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
Thick versus Thin Analysis |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
Drawing Together the Four Criteria |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
Cases versus Observations |
|
|
250 | (2) |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
250 | (2) |
|
Data-Set Observations versus Causal-Process Observations |
|
|
252 | (12) |
|
Examples of Causal-Process Observations |
|
|
256 | (2) |
|
Implications of Contrasting Types of Observations |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
Qualitative versus Quantitative |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
Adding Observations and Adding Variables: Consequences for the N, Degrees of Freedom, and Inferential Leverage |
|
|
260 | (2) |
|
Implications for Research Design |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
Standard Quantitative Tools versus Careful Analysis of Causal-Process Observations |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
Conclusion: Drawing Together the Argument |
|
|
264 | (2) |
|
Balancing Methodological Priorities: Technification and the Quest for Shared Standards |
|
|
266 | (1) |
Appendix Data-Set Observations versus Causal-Process Observations: The 2000 U.S. Presidential Election |
|
267 | (1) |
|
|
|
The Option of Regression Analysis |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
Turning to Causal-Process Observations |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
|
271 | (2) |
Glossary |
|
273 | (1) |
|
Jason Seawright and David Collier |
|
|
Bibliography |
|
315 | (24) |
Subject Index |
|
339 | (8) |
Name Index |
|
347 | (8) |
Contributors |
|
355 | (6) |
Acknowledgment of Permission to Reprint Copyrighted Material |
|
361 | |