Preface |
|
xiii | |
|
1 Introduction to Statistical Analysis |
|
|
1 | (19) |
|
USES OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
GENERAL METHODOLOGICAL TERMS |
|
|
3 | (7) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
LEVELS OF MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF DATA |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
OTHER MEASUREMENT CLASSIFICATIONS |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Discrete Variables and Continuous Variables |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Dichotomous, Binary, and Dummy Variables |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
CATEGORIES OF STATISTICAL ANALYSES |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Number of Variables Analyzed |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
2 Frequency Distributions and Graphs |
|
|
20 | (19) |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
Absolute Frequency Distributions |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Cumulative Frequency Distributions |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Percentage Frequency Distributions |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Cumulative Percentage Distributions |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
GROUPED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
USING FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS TO ANALYZE DATA |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
MISREPRESENTATION OF DATA |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Example: An Administrator's Efforts to Hire More Women |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF DATA |
|
|
29 | (7) |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
A COMMON MISTAKE IN DISPLAYING DATA |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
3 Central Tendency and Variability |
|
|
39 | (19) |
|
|
39 | (9) |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
Which Measure of Central Tendency to Use? |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
|
48 | (8) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
Reporting Measures of Variability |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
|
58 | (18) |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
CONVERTING RAW SCORES TO z SCORES AND PERCENTILES |
|
|
64 | (9) |
|
Practical Uses of z Scores |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
DERIVING RAW SCORES FROM PERCENTILES |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
5 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing |
|
|
76 | (24) |
|
|
76 | (5) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (3) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
The One-Tailed Research Hypothesis |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
The Two-Tailed Research Hypothesis |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
The "No Relationship" Research Hypothesis |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
TESTING THE NULL HYPOTHESIS |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
ERRORS IN DRAWING CONCLUSIONS ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIPS AND MEANINGFUL FINDINGS |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
Assessing Strength (Effect Size) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Is the Relationship Surprising? |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Complex Interpretations of Statistically Significant Relationships |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
6 Sampling Distributions and Hypothesis Testing |
|
|
100 | (18) |
|
SAMPLE SIZE AND SAMPLING ERROR |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
SAMPLING DISTRIBUTIONS AND INFERENCE |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
Comparing an Experimental Sample with Its Population |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Comparing a Nonexperimental Sample with Its Population |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
SAMPLING DISTRIBUTION OF MEANS |
|
|
104 | (9) |
|
Samples Drawn from Normal Distributions |
|
|
107 | (5) |
|
Samples Drawn from Skewed Distributions |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
ESTIMATING PARAMETERS FROM STATISTICS |
|
|
113 | (3) |
|
Constructing a 95 Percent Confidence Interval |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Constructing a 99 Percent Confidence Interval |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
7 Selecting a Statistical Test |
|
|
118 | (18) |
|
THE IMPORTANCE OF SELECTING THE CORRECT STATISTICAL TEST |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN SELECTING A STATISTICAL TEST |
|
|
120 | (7) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Distribution of the Variables within the Population |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Level of Measurement of the Independent and Dependent Variables |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Amount of Statistical Power That Is Desirable |
|
|
123 | (3) |
|
Robustness of Tests Being Considered |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
PARAMETRIC AND NONPARAMETRIC TESTS |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL TESTS |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR TEST SELECTION |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
GETTING HELP WITH DATA ANALYSES |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
|
136 | (29) |
|
|
136 | (4) |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
INTERPRETING LINEAR CORRELATIONS |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
Understanding Correlation Coefficients |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
Interpreting Very Strong Correlations |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
The Coefficient of Determination |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
Correlation Is Not Causation |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
USING CORRELATION FOR INFERENCE |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
COMPUTATION AND PRESENTATION OF PEARSON'S r |
|
|
148 | (6) |
|
Example: Verbal Participation among Female Group Members |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
Example: Worker Experience and Error Rates |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
NONPARAMETRIC ALTERNATIVES |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
Example: Caregiver Attitudes and Longevity of Hospice Patients |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
USING CORRELATION WITH THREE OR MORE VARIABLES |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
OTHER MULTIVARIATE TESTS THAT USE CORRELATION |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
|
165 | (24) |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
WHAT IS SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION? |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
Formulating a Research Question |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Limitations of Simple Linear Regression |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
COMPUTATION OF THE REGRESSION EQUATION |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
MORE ABOUT THE REGRESSION LINE |
|
|
173 | (4) |
|
The Least-Squares Criterion |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
The Regression Coefficient (b) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Interchanging X and Y Variables |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
USING REGRESSION ANALYSES IN SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
Example: Socializing with Family Members and Life Satisfaction |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
Example: Worker's Caseload Size and Number of Sick Days Taken |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
REGRESSION WITH THREE OR MORE VARIABLES |
|
|
180 | (4) |
|
OTHER TYPES OF REGRESSION ANALYSES |
|
|
184 | (3) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
189 | (28) |
|
THE CHI-SQUARE TEST OF ASSOCIATION |
|
|
189 | (15) |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
Computation of Chi-Square |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Presentation of Chi-Square |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
Interpreting the Results of a Chi-Square Analysis |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
Meaningfulness and Sample Size |
|
|
200 | (3) |
|
Reporting the Strength of a Relationship |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Restrictions on the Use of Chi-Square |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
An Alternative to Chi-Square: Fisher's Exact Test |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
USING CHI-SQUARE IN SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE |
|
|
204 | (4) |
|
Example: Discharge Planning and Readmission |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
Example: Legislators' Voting Patterns and Tax Issues |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
CHI-SQUARE WITH THREE OR MORE VARIABLES |
|
|
208 | (3) |
|
Problems with Sizes of Expected Frequencies |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
Effects of Introducing Additional Variables |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
SPECIAL APPLICATIONS OF THE CHI-SQUARE FORMULA |
|
|
211 | (4) |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
11 t Tests and Analysis of Variance |
|
|
217 | (30) |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
|
219 | (7) |
|
Determining If a Sample Is Representative |
|
|
220 | (2) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
A Nonparametric Alternative: The Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test |
|
|
223 | (3) |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
Use with Two Connected (or Matched) Samples Measured Once |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Use with One Sample Measured Twice |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
A Nonparametric Alternative: The Wilcoxon Sign Test |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
|
229 | (13) |
|
Example: Treatment of Marital Problems |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
Example: Study Guide for the State Merit Exam |
|
|
233 | (2) |
|
|
235 | (3) |
|
Nonparametric Alternatives: U and K-S |
|
|
238 | (4) |
|
A MULTIVARIATE ALTERNATIVE TO THE t TESTS: T2 |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
SIMPLE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ONE-WAY ANOVA) |
|
|
242 | (3) |
|
A Nonparametric Alternative: The Kruskal-Wallis Test |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
MULTIPLE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
Appendix A Using Statistics to Evaluate Practice Effectiveness |
|
|
247 | (13) |
|
|
247 | (5) |
|
Needs Assessments and Formative Evaluations |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
Statistical Analyses of Program Outcome Data |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
EVALUATING INDIVIDUAL PRACTITIONER EFFECTIVENESS |
|
|
252 | (8) |
|
Hypothesis Testing in Single System Research |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
Statistical Analyses of Single System Data |
|
|
253 | (7) |
Glossary |
|
260 | (17) |
Index |
|
277 | |